Nick Robinson challenged Richard Tice to produce evidence about Reform UK’s two billionaire donors after the party’s deputy leader asked listeners to trust its internal compliance checks.
During an interview on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday, September 14, Robinson repeatedly questioned when Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne had returned to Britain.
The two cryptocurrency billionaires have reportedly given Reform £36 million each, providing Nigel Farage’s party with £72 million in two days.
Tice maintained that the payments complied with existing and proposed rules. Robinson also challenged his claim that the donors wanted nothing in return, pointing to Reform’s support for policies favourable to the cryptocurrency industry.
‘I don’t trust any statement by politicians’
The residency questions arose because proposed changes to donation rules would restrict large contributions from British citizens returning from overseas.
Harborne has been based in Thailand, while Delo previously lived in Hong Kong. Robinson wanted to know when Harborne had moved back to Britain and whether he paid UK tax on foreign earnings.
Tice said he did not know Harborne’s tax arrangements and could not account for every day the donors spent in the country.
He nevertheless insisted:
“We just know they’ve complied with the rules and regulations, both existing and proposed.”
Asked about Delo’s return, Tice said he understood it had happened “many, many months ago”, without providing a precise date. The London Economic reported the exchange.
When Tice appealed to listeners to trust Reform’s checks, Robinson replied:
“I don’t trust any statement by politicians wanting to bank tens of millions of pounds. I need evidence.”
That response was highlighted by The Poke as clips from the interview circulated online.
Robinson questions what attracted the donors
Robinson also pressed Tice on the relationship between the donors’ business interests and Reform’s cryptocurrency policies.
He asked what had attracted two cryptocurrency billionaires to give such large sums to a party promising to cut their taxes and reduce regulation of their industry.
The question drew comparisons with comedian Caroline Aherne’s Mrs Merton character, whose interviews used apparently innocent questions to expose an awkward underlying point.
Tice defended the donors’ motivations, describing them as patriotic supporters who wanted a change of government rather than personal rewards.
“Our money comes with no demands,” he said.
Robinson argued that policies favourable to their industry already amounted to something of value. Tice’s response was that Reform had adopted its cryptocurrency policies before the latest donations, rather than changing them to secure the money.
Why the residency dates matter
The Government’s Representation of the People Bill proposes an annual £100,000 cap on donations from overseas electors.
It would also introduce a minimum-residency period for returning British citizens. Under the proposals, those donors would remain subject to the cap until they had been back in Britain for a full calendar year.
The House of Commons Library briefing explains that the returning-resident restriction would cover both people registered as overseas electors and British citizens who had not registered while living abroad.
The legislation has not yet become law. Ministers have said restrictions will operate retrospectively, making the donors’ circumstances relevant to whether Reform could retain the full payments once the changes take effect.
Tice’s assurances did not settle that question during the interview because he did not supply the dates Robinson requested.
That absence of detail is not, by itself, proof of a breach. Reform maintains that both donations comply with the rules.
The proposed restrictions on donations made using cryptocurrency are also a separate issue: a donor making their fortune in crypto does not establish that their political donation was paid in cryptoassets.
A new dispute alongside existing investigations
Reform’s latest funding controversy comes while other financial arrangements are already under scrutiny.
Police are examining allegations concerning possible foreign funding following a Channel 4 News undercover investigation. Reform denies wrongdoing. Harborne’s separate £5 million personal gift to Farage is also the subject of a parliamentary standards inquiry.
Neither investigation should be treated as a finding that the newly reported £36 million donations were improper. The earlier funding allegations concern separate matters.
For Robinson, the immediate questions were whether Reform could substantiate its compliance assurances and how it could explain the overlap between its policies and its donors’ interests.
Tice defended both the payments and the donors, but the interview ended without the precise residency information the presenter had sought.
2 responses to “Nick Robinson channels Mrs Merton with savage question about Reform’s £72m donors”
-
The proposed reforms do not go far enough. So called “expats” (and others) should be able to demonstrate that they have lived in and paid taxes to the U.K. for at least half of their adult lifetime.
-
Both donations are to a Limited Liability Company that should be required to show them in their accounts, together with where they are used.
Even if their auditors and accountants are ‘creative’, I’m sure Private Eye will be asking the right questions!
Leave a Reply