Donald Trump has finally discovered the secret to making America unimaginably rich: stop buying things.
The US president unveiled his economic breakthrough while speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, where he attempted to explain how cutting off trade with other countries could turn the United States into what he called a “big money machine”.
Trump said:
“If we cut off trade with that country, we just made $40 billion.”
According to Trump’s theory, repeating the trick with a few more trading partners would allow the money to come rolling in.
There was just one small problem. That is not how trade works. It is not really how buying things works either.
The $40 billion has not simply disappeared
Trump appeared to be describing a country that sells around $40 billion more to the United States than it buys from it.
But American consumers and businesses do not send that money overseas and receive nothing in return. They receive cars, food, machinery, energy, electronics, raw materials and other goods or services that they wanted to buy.
Stopping those purchases does not place $40 billion in the US Treasury. It means Americans no longer have the things they were buying.
Some of those products might be replaced by American-made alternatives. Others would have to come from a different country, potentially at a higher price. In cases where there is no ready substitute, businesses could face shortages or struggle to produce their own goods.
It is the economic equivalent of cancelling your weekly food shop and congratulating yourself on the money you have “made”.
That was exactly the point @David_Moscrop made:
“I stopped trading with my grocery store and saved $600 a month but also I starved to death.”
Concise, accessible and still considerably more detailed than the president’s explanation.
Trump’s unusual understanding of a trade deficit
Trump has spent years talking about trade deficits as though they were cheques handed by the American government to foreign countries.
They are not.
A trade deficit simply means that a country imports more goods and services than it exports during a particular period. It does not show that the country has lost that amount of money, nor does it say whether individual transactions were useful or profitable.
The latest figures from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis put America’s goods and services trade deficit at $73.3 billion in June 2026. That figure records the difference between imports and exports. It is not a government bill waiting to be paid.
Trump made his remarks after being asked about a temporary move to allow more beef into the United States at lower tariff rates in an effort to bring down prices.
That provided an awkward backdrop to his claim that America did not need foreign products. His own administration had just decided that importing more of one particular product could help American shoppers.
Tariffs can discourage imports and raise government revenue, but they are taxes charged on imported goods. The World Trade Organization explains that they give domestic producers a price advantage by making competing imports more expensive.
They are not invoices sent to foreign governments. The initial bill falls on the importer, which can then absorb the cost or pass some of it on through higher prices.
Cutting off trade entirely goes much further. It also risks retaliation against American exporters, leaving farmers and manufacturers with fewer customers overseas.
There can be legitimate reasons for reducing dependence on another country, particularly where national security or crucial supply chains are involved. But that is very different from claiming every dollar not spent on an import has somehow been “made”.
The replies were not kind
The clip was shared by @atrupar and rapidly attracted the sort of economic peer review that probably does not appear in White House briefing papers.
@ddale8 offered a compact assessment:
“Extremely not how it works.”
@RpsAgainstTrump wrote:
“This imbecile has absolutely no clue how an economy works.”
@smalls2672 appeared slightly alarmed by the fact that the person delivering the lesson was also running the world’s largest economy:
@Bill43111 struggled to find a sufficiently strong description:
“Describing Trump as stupid seems so inadequate.”
@SkinnerPm suggested it took considerable effort to reach this level of certainty while being so wrong:
“It takes decades upon decades of willful ignorance and never being held accountable to be this wrong.”
Meanwhile, @NormOrnstein questioned what Trump had learned during his time at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School:
“He knows less about basic economics than a typical third grader.”
@JessicaBRiedl eventually arrived at the response shared by anyone still attempting to follow the argument:
“I… I give up.”
Welcome to the big money machine
Trump’s explanation does at least offer an intriguing new way to approach household finances.
Stop shopping at the supermarket and you have “made” the cost of your groceries. Cancel the electricity and you have “made” the value of the bill. Refuse to pay the mortgage and you have “made” the entire monthly payment.
The only disadvantage is that you will be hungry, sitting in the dark and shortly looking for somewhere else to live.
International trade is more complicated than a household budget, but the central flaw is much the same. Money spent on imports buys something. Removing the spending also removes the product.
America may choose to produce more at home, diversify its suppliers or protect strategically important industries. All of those choices come with costs and trade-offs that a government can debate.
What it cannot do is turn $40 billion of imports into $40 billion of free money merely by stopping them.
Unless Trump really has invented a big money machine, in which case it may be worth checking whether anybody remembered to put products in it.
3 responses to “Donald Trump tried to explain international trade and accidentally invented an economy without products”
Andrew Pahlow
Americans getting exactly what they deserve for voting in a racist, bigoted, spoiled toddler with rampant narcissistic traits as their president. I hope it gets much worse before it gets better and then, when it gets better, the new administration go after Trump and his entire clown posse for their corrupr, criminal and treasonous behaviours.
It will be so much more fun to watch, even though the current situation is darkly amusing.
I’m not a god fearing woman, BUT, if there is one, let him/her be a vengeful one and do to this man & his sycophants EXACTLY what he’s done to those he has destroyed.
Jordon Scott is a digital media specialist and editor at The Daily Britain. He focuses on political coverage, platform strategy, and ensuring journalism remains accessible without compromising editorial standards.
He oversees publication structure, reach, and transparency across the site.
Americans getting exactly what they deserve for voting in a racist, bigoted, spoiled toddler with rampant narcissistic traits as their president. I hope it gets much worse before it gets better and then, when it gets better, the new administration go after Trump and his entire clown posse for their corrupr, criminal and treasonous behaviours.
It will be so much more fun to watch, even though the current situation is darkly amusing.
I’m not a god fearing woman, BUT, if there is one, let him/her be a vengeful one and do to this man & his sycophants EXACTLY what he’s done to those he has destroyed.
Leave a Reply